ABSTRACT
South Africa is classified as a low- and middle-income country, with a complex mixture of resource-rich and resource-limited settings. In the major referral hospitals, the necessary skill level exists for the management of complex challenges. However, this contrasts with the frequently-inadequate skill levels of anaesthesia practitioners in resource-limited environments. In Japan, obstetricians administer anaesthesia for 40% of caesarean deliveries and 80% of labour analgesia. Centralisation of delivery facilities is now occurring and it is expected that obstetric anaesthesiologists will be available 24â¯h a day in centralised facilities in the future. In China, improvements in women's reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health are critical government policies. Obstetric anaesthesia, especially labour analgesia, has received unprecedented attention. Chinese obstetric anaesthesiologists are passionate about clinical research, focusing on efficacy, safety, and topical issues. The Latin-American region has different landscapes, people, languages, and cultures, and is one of the world's regions with the most inequality. There are large gaps in research, knowledge, and health services, and the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists is committed to working with governmental and non-governmental organisations to improve patient care and access to safe anaesthesia. Anaesthesia workforce challenges, exacerbated by coronavirus disease 2019, beset North American healthcare. Pre-existing struggles by governments and decision-makers to improve health care access remain, partly due to unfamiliarity with the role of the anaesthesiologist. In addition to weaknesses in work environments and dated standards of work culture, the work-life balance demanded by new generations of anaesthesiologists must be acknowledged.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical , COVID-19 , Pregnancy , Adolescent , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Female , Latin America , Japan , South Africa , China , North AmericaABSTRACT
Background: Recent MRI-based studies have raised great concern about frequent cardiac involvement even in mild or asymptomatic COVID-19. However, while signs of myocardial injury were found in large proportions of patients after COVID-19, all studies published to date lack baseline imaging and are therefore unable to discriminate between pre-existing and COVID-19-induced injury. Purpose: In this longitudinal study, we aimed to assess the true cardiac impact of COVID-19 based on pre- and post-COVID-19 late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MRI. Methods: A prospective registry of patients with serial LGE-MRIs was screened for patients with documented SARS-COV-2 infection after cardiac LGE-MRI. Eligible patients then received a post-COVID-19 LGE-MRI using the same scanner and sequence as in the pre-COVID-19 MRI. Inversion recovery prepared T1-weighted gradient echo sequences were acquired in sinus rhythm using ECG gating and a free-breathing 3D navigator, 15–20 minutes after administering an intravenous bolus of 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobutrol. A TI scout sequence was used in order to determine the optimal TI that nullified the left ventricular myocardial signal. The presence of LGE was independently assessed qualitatively by two experienced investigators blinded to patient information. For quantitative analyses a 3D-reconstruction of the left ventricle was performed using ADAS-3D software. LGE was then automatically quantified based on a prespecified signal intensity threshold of ≥3 SD above the mean of a remote non-enhanced myocardial region. Results: Pre- and post-COVID LGE-MRI from 31 patients with cardiovascular risk factors that had recovered from mild to moderate COVID-19 (23% hospitalised) were analysed. At a median of 5 months post-COVID-19, LGE-lesions indicative of myocardial injury were encountered in 15 out of 31 patients (48%), which is in line with previous reports. However, intraindividual comparison with the pre-COVID-19 MRI reveiled all of these lesions as pre-existing and thus not COVID-19-related. Quantitative analysis detected no increase in the size of individual LGE-lesions, nor in the global left ventricular LGE-extent. There was no difference in any functional or structural parameter between pre- and post-COVID-19 MRI. Conclusion: This longitudinal study in a cohort of patients considered at high risk of cardiac involvement, did not find any evidence for COVID-19-induced myocardial injury. The complete absence of de novo LGE lesions in this cohort is reassuring and indicates that cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 are rare and certainly not as common as previously suggested. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.Figure 1Table 1
ABSTRACT
COVID 19 infection also affects obstetric patients. Regular obstetric care has continued despite the pandemic. Case series of obstetric patients have been published. Neuroaxial techniques appear to be safe and it is important to obtain the highest possible rate of success of the blocks before a cesarean section. For this reason, it is recommended that the blocks be carried out by senior anesthesiologists. The protection and safety of professionals is a key point and in case of general anesthesia, so it is also recommended to call to the most expert anesthesiologist. Seriously ill patients should be recognized quickly and early, in order to provide them with the appropriate treatment as soon as possible. Susceptibility to thrombosis makes prophylactic anticoagulation a priority. Resumen La infección por COVID 19 afecta también a las pacientes obstétricas. La atención obstétrica habitual ha continuado a pesar de la pandemia. Existen series de casos de pacientes obstétricas. Parece que las técnicas neuroaxiales son seguras y es importante asegurarse que los bloqueos funcionen correctamente antes de una cesárea. Es por esto, que se recomienda que los bloqueos sean realizados por anestesiólogos expertos. La protección y seguridad de los profesionales es un punto fundamental y en caso de anestesia general, también se recomienda acudir al anestesiólogo más experto. Las pacientes gravemente enfermas, deben reconocerse rápida y precozmente, para poder suministrarles el tratamiento adecuado lo antes posible. La susceptibilidad a las trombosis hace que la anticoagulación profiláctica sea prioritaria.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 infection also affects obstetric patients. Regular obstetric care has continued despite the pandemic. Case series of obstetric patients have been published. Neuroaxial techniques appear to be safe and it is important to obtain the highest possible rate of success of the blocks before a cesarean section. For this reason, it is recommended that the blocks be carried out by senior anesthesiologists. The protection and safety of professionals is a key point and in case of general anesthesia, so it is also recommended to call to the most expert anesthesiologist. Seriously ill patients should be recognized quickly and early, in order to provide them with the appropriate treatment as soon as possible. Susceptibility to thrombosis makes prophylactic anticoagulation a priority.